Link
Notes
- Macro view: The “internet of jobs” is happening
- The internet of information revolutionized everything in society that had to do with information. Every piece of information can now run along a computer network
-
And I believe that the internet of value will do the same for anything that has to do with value transfer because we can now transfer value/scarcity along a computer network
- People aren’t focusing enough on Internet of Jobs — what comes after DAOs
- The internet of jobs can make web3 go mainstream — most people don’t think about investing when they think of their financial well-being; they think about their jobs
-
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
— Buckminster Fuller
- > And that’s our goal: to create more value for everyday members of society. As opposed to the gig economy which sort of boxes people in in a race to the bottom; commodification of skillsets.
- Related post: the internet of jobs is here
- This mission is about talent.
- The point of moonshot collective / gitcoin is to build a product suite that helps DAOs recruit, recognize, reward and retain talent.
- What is the “coordination party kit” CPK
- tip.party (example)
- Now we’re trying to get
- others: pay.party, https://grants.gtcdao.net, tokenstream.party
- tokenstream blew my fucking mind. I’d heard of superfluid and so the idea itself isn’t really novel, but their use case is very tangible and the implementation is so clean.
- Questions Break:
- Community building analysis tools? Lots of the thinking around this is still very high level and no real analysis has been done on the nitty gritty
- should we have standards? We still believe in decentralization, but I think the design space needs to be explored before we set standards
- Individualism & Collectivism (separate talk)
- basic definition on a high-level (spoiler alert: these two groups don’t often agree)
- 
- What’ especially interesting though is that they don’t even agree about the definitions of each other.
- > Individualists care about individual sovereignty and avoiding coercion; Collectivists care about the group good… I.e. for individualists the axis is sovereign vs not & for collectivists the axis is group good vs. individual good
- Taxation is a great example:
- 
- 
- And important here is the point tot understand a better way to disagree about this stuff — at the end of the day, balance is what we both want
- 
- > Web 3 creates non-coercive markets for public goods.
- where we are and where we want to go
- 